Omega 2639

A beauty: Cal 266 Manual. Credit: Brevetwatches. Best, Nicolas

. . . there would be so many to choose from. As you may know, WotW is primarily decided on the strength of a watch's intrigue. Wrist Shot and Static Photo are more beauty contests than content, while WotW represents substance over style. In other words, a

. . . it's hard to say how many exist. I believe they were delivered exclusively to the Swedish agent in the '40s, some of which ended up as service watches for the Swedish military. Ref 2383, incidentally, was identical to ref 2400 but offered to other (

These " small " time only Omega are ultra charming. Ref 2400: Ref 2639: Credit pictures: Brevetwatches. Everything is lovely, here. At the point I have no favorite among them. You? Best, Nicolas

. . . is the steel ref 2366 . . . . . . fitted with a Causmann dial from the '90s and a replacement crown. No movement image provided, but it should have a 30T2rg inside. This one is the homage produced in the mid-'90s in yellow gold . . . . . . and white

Hello friends I takes me more than two years to find this 1951/1952 Omega but the waiting was worth. She has the reference 2639 and work with a manual wound movement, the caliber 265, one of the best manual movements when she came out and until today she

2639 was made in large numbers, with many different dials and different hands also. The 2639 on Chrono24: Suverän 2400 was exclusive for Sweeden, easy to se just look at the back. Best Thomas

Hi ! This has just returned from service. It was an impulse purchase, a non running watch, that only needed some tlc, cleaning and oil Ref. 2639-14 Cal. 266 1953 Anyone who knows why there is a star under the ref. number? Best Thomas

These ref. 2639 were made in large numbers, but i think they represents a lot of what i like about these old Omegas. Fine case size, 36 mm, with out the crown, many dial designs, this one a bulls eye, the fine 30 mm. movement cal. 265 or 266, look at the

hi guys, i need a bit of advice about the Omega century. this pic makes me think the dial is redone, can someone confirm that. also this one has a movement dating it from 1964, but a ref number on the caseback which doesnt fit with a watch of that age. it